Design Innovation Incorporating Additive Manufacturing: Creation and Assessment of a Design Tool
With the emergence of Additive Manufacturing (AM), designers now have an entirely new manufacturing process to consider when developing a new product or redesigning an existing part. AM has the ability to produce complex parts and fast economical prototypes which may have previously been difficult or impossible to make. AM is a new tool to aid a design team to reach their design goal. Many businesses may have a need to incorporate AM into their current design model. However, there is a lack of heuristics and methodologies on how this can be achieved. To help enhance designing for additive manufacturing (DfAM), this research follows the redesigning of an existing aluminum bracket system on a satellite, which is currently made from traditional subtractive machining processes. The redesigned part is to be made from the same aluminum compound as the original design, but now produced using AM processes. The part will be printed by a Selective Laser Sintering (SLS) machine, model M290 manufactured by EOS with the aid of topology software. The design team is following the UK Design Council’s successful and robust 4-D design method throughout the entire project. The Discover, Define, Develop, Deliver (4-D) process focuses on user-centered design and incorporates innovation enhancing methods throughout. The Discover phase focuses on deep understanding and empathy for the user. The Define phase uses various modeling methods to describe details of the user’s interaction with the product, process or system being designed. The Develop phase uses different methods to create a large quantity of ideas for how the design might satisfy the user and the Deliver phase uses a set of methods to prototype, test and pitch the design deliverables.
As part of the design project to used AM to enhance the design of the satellite, we are developing and accessing a computer based design assistance tool that will help designers to incorporate AM into their design. This is done in the context of the 4-D design process identified above. The tool is intended to be used by design engineers that have limited knowledge of AM capabilities and especially how to incorporate AM design capabilities into the 4-D design process (or a similar process). The tool includes design heuristics for each of the 4Ds that will assist the designer to consider or implement AM capabilities into that design process step. Assessment of the tool is done using a set of engineers that have some knowledge of AM but are not experts in this area. Initial results show that the design assessment tool is very helpful when designers consider using AM and also in helping them use AM in effective and efficient manners.
Design Innovation Incorporating Additive Manufacturing: Creation and Assessment of a Design Tool
Category
Technical Paper Publication
Description
Session: 09-01-01 Curriculum Innovations, Pedagogy and Learning Methodologies
ASME Paper Number: IMECE2020-24309
Session Start Time: November 18, 2020, 04:25 PM
Presenting Author: Dan Jensen
Presenting Author Bio: Dr Jensen received a Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering Science from the University of Colorado, Boulder. He was a Professor of Engineering Mechanics at the US Air Force Academy for 21 years (now retired) where he ran the mechanical design program. He is currently a Scholar in Residence at the University of Colorado in Denver and a Fellow at the International Design Center which is the largest design research center in the world. This center is located at both the Singapore University of Technology and Design and at MIT. He also runs an engineering consulting company which specializes in training in engineering design. Dr Jensen regularly teaches courses in “Innovation in Product/Systems Design” at the SUTD/MIT Academy and in other venues. He has trained hundreds of design teams in “Innovation in Design of Products, Processes and Services” and has written over 135 peer-reviewed papers. He has secured grants for approximately $6 million in research funding and have overseen the creation of dozens of patents.
Authors: Daniel Jensen University of Colorado Denver
Mark Menefee University of Colorado Denver
Mahesh Pokharel University of Colorado Denver
Brian Kaplun Lockheed
Kristin WoodUniversity of Colorado - Denver
Chris Yakacki University of Colorado - Denver