[Skip to Content]
Provided by ASME The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Banner
IMECE2026
Vancouver Convention Centre
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Conference Dates: November 8 — 12, 2026
Exhibition Dates: November 9 — 11, 2026
Menu
  • Tracks & Topics
  • Publication Schedule
  • Event Site
  • Home
  • Policies
    • Confirm Co-Authorship
    • Presentation Requirements
    • Code of Conduct/Anti-Harassment
  • Help/Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Author Resources
      • ASME Presenter Attendance Policy
      • ASME Plagiarism Screening (iThenticate)
      • Full-length Paper Preparation
      • Conference-Specific Information and Templates
      • Copyright Transfer Form
      • Technical Presentation Tips
      • Indexing
      • Authorship and AI Tools
      • Author FAQs
      • Submission Types
    • Organizer Resources
      • Reviewer Guidelines
    • Help Desk Calls
    • Webtool Feedback and Feature Requests
  • Home
  • ASME 2021 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (IMECE2021) Topic/Session Gallery
  • 07-11-01 Mobile Robots and Unmanned Ground Vehicles I
  • A Comparative Analysis of Object Detection Algorithms in Naturalistic Driving Videos_x000B_

Session: 07-11-01 Mobile Robots and Unmanned Ground Vehicles I

Paper Number: 69975

Start Time: Tuesday, 01:50 PM

69975 - A Comparative Analysis of Object Detection Algorithms in Naturalistic Driving Videos_x000B_ 

Autonomous vehicle research has been rapidly developing because it improves transportation efficiency and reduces vehicle crash accidents due to human errors as well. Among all the studies in autonomous vehicles, object detection and perception of the surrounding environment is one of the most critical study areas for autonomous vehicles’ driving safety. Numerous high-precision neural network-based models have been developed for object detection tasks in computer vision with the availability of increasing computational speed. Nevertheless, autonomous vehicles' requirements for object detection algorithms are far more than detection accuracy and precision. Real-world driving scenarios such as bad weather, sunlight reflection, vehicle vibration, among others, can adversely affect the detection algorithms' robustness and reliability. This paper presents a comprehensive comparison among four popular algorithms: (a). Single Shot Multibox Detector (SSD), (b). Deconvolutional Single Shot Multibox Detector (DSSD, (c). faster regions with convolutional neural network (R-CNN), and (d). Yolo-V4 for object detection under real driving conditions. The reasons to select these four algorithms are because they are (a) popular state-of-art algorithms (SOTA) that achieve high multiple objects detection accuracies and precisions, (b) able to be processed at real-time speed (at least faster than 30 fps), and (c) widely applied at real-world conditions.

Each neural network model is initially trained with the same data sets, the 80-classes COCO dataset, then fine-tuned by the 10-classes BDD100K dataset, to compare the algorithms equally. The former dataset contains more object types (human, animal, electric appliance, etc.), and is commonly used for general object detection training, while the latter is specifically designed for real-world naturalistic driving studies with only traffic-related object types (car, bicycle, traffic lights, etc.). When the model is trained by the COCO dataset, all neural network model parameters can be updated while the model is trained by the BDD dataset, the feature extraction layers’ parameters are set to be fixed, and only the classification layers’ parameters are allowed to be updated. After training all networks, the overall mean average precision (mAP), video running speed (fps), mAPs on different weather conditions (snow, rain, and fog, etc.), mAPs at a different time (dawn, afternoon, and evening, etc.), and small object detection accuracies are evaluated and compared. Finally, all the networks' performance and future object detection algorithm prospects are illustrated with conclusions on preferred models. The study will guide future research on the evaluated NN-based objection detection algorithms' pros and cons.

Keywords: Autonomous Vehicle, Neural Network, Object Detection, Deep Learning

Presenting Author: Ce Zhang Virginia Tech

Authors:

Ce Zhang Virginia Tech
Azim Eskandarian Virginia Tech

A Comparative Analysis of Object Detection Algorithms in Naturalistic Driving Videos_x000B_

Paper Type

Technical Paper Publication

This site supports all modern browsers, such as Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. Microsoft has announced it will no longer support IE 11 as of August 2021. If you prefer to or you are required to continue using a Microsoft browser, you can use Edge.

  • ASME.ORG
  • Press
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Statement
  • ASME Communication Preferences
  • Community Rules

© The American Society of Mechanical Engineers

Stay Connected